     
The LSSP proposal
The
statement made by the Lanka Sama Samaja Party General
Secretary, Mr. Batty Weerakoon, titled 'South's
responsibility for killings in the North' merits serious
study. The oldest political party in Sri Lanka and a
constituent party of the People's Alliance is pointing
out that a critical point has been reached in the
government's peace process and unless there is a renewed
commitment by the PA government to the political solution
it has advanced, the peace process will be wrecked.
There will be divergent views
expressed by different political parties on the LSSP
statement, but basically it resonates the argument
forwarded by political analysts as well as commentators
that consensus should be reached between the two main
political parties in the South for any political solution
to be possible.
The LSSP argues that political
forces in the South, apart from offering their
condolences to the recent spate of killings of Tamil
politicians in Jaffna such as Mayors Sarojini Yogeswaran
and Sivapalan, have made no attempt to understand the
underlying meaning of these new killings done by the
fascist LTTE, in complete disregard to public opinion.
The people of Jaffna who had left
their homes in the face of advancing Riviresa troops had
returned to their localities after the LTTE were
dislodged from its strongholds, the LSSP says, and
contends that this was done in the face of stiff
opposition from the LTTE. The TULF despite its initial
hesitation and mistrust contested the local government
elections to help re-establish local government
administration in the North in the teeth of LTTE
opposition, the LSSP says
The LTTE was unable to carry out
its killings earlier because the people stood with the
democratic forces. But with growing disenchantment of the
people and the feeling of being betrayed, the LTTE was
able to kill with political impunity, says the LSSP. The
people of the North are justified in concluding that they
remain exposed to these killings because political
parties in the South have betrayed the trust and
confidence they placed in a political solution projected
by the PA government, it is contended
The PA can convincingly demonstrate
its commitment to a political solution by presenting to
Parliament its draft constitutional amendment (Devolution
Package), and there is no reason why PA-UNP consensus
cannot be reached on it through the adoption of UNP's
amendments to the draft constitution, the LSSP statement
concludes.
The UNP has presented two sets of
draft proposals but they have yet to comment directly on
some of the substantive proposals made in the Devolution
Package. The basic proposal on which other proposals of
the Devolution Package rests is in the shift from a
unitary state to a union of regions. While the UNP sticks
by the 13th Amendment for which they were
responsible when in power on devolving power to
the provinces, it is by no means clear whether they are
in support of the proposed union of regions.
When the proposals in the
Devolution Package and the UNP proposals are considered,
they appear to be running on two different tracks
occasionally merging and diverging at other places. The
stands taken by the two political parties on the other
basic issue of the unit of devolution and the proposed
referenda for the people to decide on the merger or
demerger of the Northern and Eastern provinces too are
not very definitive.
Given the political vituperation
that is going on between the two sides, political
consensus appears to be elusive even though the LSSP, a
constituent party of the PA coalition, calls for it.
The other issue to consider is
whether the LTTE did or does care for the opinion of the
Tamil people as claimed by the LTTE. Is the assumption
that the LTTE did not carry out political assassinations
after the return of the people of Jaffna to their homes
when Operation Riviresa was completed correct? Or is it
that the Tigers were simply biding their time? The LSSP
contention that the faith, hope and trust placed by the
Tamil people for a political solution projected by the PA
have been dissipated and it should be renewed is correct
but whether it could be done by incorporating the
Devolution Package and the UNP proposals is much in doubt
and needs deeper examination.
It is also essential to consider
other political realities. There is a very strong
opposition in the South to the Devolution Package. And
the LTTE had rejected it in its totality.
Nonetheless, the LSSP proposal
calls for a response from the UNP, constituent parties of
the PA, mainly the SLFP as well as the TULF and other
political parties in the North.
|