- The
week that was
President
exposes LTTE at UN meeting
The opportunity
afforded to the president to address the U.N. at
the opening of the General Assembly provided an
opportunity to expose the true nature of the
LTTE. She said it was an insult to compare them
with the liberation movements of other countries
such as Africa. She also had amicable discussions
with the U.S. President and Nelson Mandela with
foreign minister Lakshman Kadirgamar in
attendance. (full text)
- Are
the educational reforms on the correct track?
Sometime back Prof. G.
L. Peiris commented on the lethargic and
laissez-faire attitude of academics and
professionals towards innovations/projects
launched by the government. He stressed that the
academics and the professionals could make a
worthwhile contribution by offering constructive
criticism based on sound data. This is widely
practised in countries like UK and USA because
such active participation brings in a self
correcting mechanism into the entire process of
government. (full text)
- Germans vote
in a pivotal election
Today German voters will decide
who will usher Europe's economically most
powerful nation into the next millennium.
Chancellor Helmut Kohl (68) is making an
unprecedented bid for a fifth successive term in
office and is battling for the prize, a few
percentage points behind a telegenic and much
younger opponent. Gerhard Schroeder (54) Since
the election campaign began some four months ago.
Schroeder has led in the public opinion polls but
Kohl has been steadily catching up and, on the
eve of the election, the result is too close to
predict. (full
text)
|
- L
E G A L W A T C H
Private
lives and public office
The right to privacy,
debated around the world in September 1997
following the death of Princess Diana, has again
become a global topic of discussion exactly one
year later, due to the problems - some would say
pillorying - of President Bill Clinton.The emotional calls for a "right to
privacy" that followed Dianas death
were somewhat misguided because, as this column
pointed out at the time, even if there had been
such a law, publicity-hungry celebrities such as
Diana would have been the first to waive it. For
instance, nobody forced her to make a confession
of marital infidelity over BBC television.
In the same way, Clinton
apologists have cleverly turned the present
debate into a seemingly simple issue involving
the private life of a public figure. (full text)
|