     
Indo-Lanka trade
pact: Let the people know
Our
comments today should have been on the Iraqi crisis but
we withhold comments on this issue for a subject which is
of vital national interest: the proposed Indo-Sri Lanka
Fast Tract Trade Agreement. Our New Delhi Correspondent
reported yesterday that Foreign Minister, Mr. Lakshman
Kadirgamar and Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh have
agreed to this so-called free trade agreement and that
President Kumaratunga will be signing it when she visits
New Delhi towards the end of this month.
Readers who are familiar with
current affairs will recall that when trade, economic or
financial agreements are signed between two countries or
with a regional bloc there is widespread discussion in
the countries concerned about the impact of such
agreements on the economies of the countries concerned
and more important on the trades and livelihood of the
people.The ding-dong battles between Europhiles and
Eurosceptics of Britain down the decades are of
relevance. As far as this proposed trade agreement is
concerned which will have repercussions in this
country far more than any trade or political agreement
signed before the people, media, the
business community and even the professionals are
blissfully unaware of the contents and fallout . On
Thursday, we published a comprehensive analysis of what
this agreement could hold out for Sri Lanka by one of
this countrys most distinguished economists, Dr. J.
B. Kelegama.
The agreement is said to be
intended to narrow the vast trade imbalance that exists
between India and Sri Lanka. But Dr. Kelegama pointed out
that given the present state of affairs, it would not
meet the intended objective. Reading through his analysis
it is obvious that it could worsen the position for Sri
Lanka and that the farmers the backbone of Sri
Lankas economy could be wiped out.
The asymmetry between two
countries, one with a billion strong population and
another with only 20 million need hardly be stressed. In
such a situation free trade between the two countries
would only result in the smaller country being swamped
with goods from the Big Brother while the Small Brother
will not be able even to make himself heard, unless there
are provisions protecting our interests written into the
agreement.
Dr. Kelegama has pointed out that
Sri Lanka is unable to produce the variety of exports
that India needs. Our basic agricultural produce is
aplenty there whereas industrial goods of India are in
demand here. We do not need an economic pundit to tell us
what this countrys plight would be in such
circumstances. It was also pointed out that in the
context of foreign investments, India, quite naturally
because of the magnitude of its market has already
attracted the multinationals. The multinationals see the
Indian middle class market estimated at around 250
million to 300 million bigger than most developed
nations is extremely fertile ground. The rest of
South Asia is seen in a supplementary context. There is
no hope of multinationals establishing their regional
headquarters here to export to India and other countries
in the region. It was also pointed out that where Indian
investments in Sri Lanka are concerned, there were no
tie-back agreements to export the manufactured products
from Sri Lanka to India. Indian investments here are to
meet the demands of our local market. Thus, how will
unrestricted imports from India, duty free, help the
besieged Sri Lanka economy?
Even more devastating is the point
made that free import of agriculture produced at CIF
prices which are far less than what the Sri Lanka farmers
could produce, will sound the death-knell of our farmers.
The government has kept the people
of this country in pitch black darkness where this
agreement is concerned. Why cannot they spell out the
contents of this agreement to the people before this
agreement is signed. Even the Opposition seems to be
blissfully unaware of this agreement or is unconcerned
about it. Is this country being taken for a ride for
whatever sinister purpose?
We do realise that India is our
giant neighbour with whom we should have good relations.
But there is no need to ruin our economy and make our
farmers commit suicide. Let us keep in mind that every
government in the post-Independence period had the
objective of making this country self-sufficient in
agricultural produce. Are we to barter away this
sustained national effort of half century in the name of
Abracadabras such as regional co-operation and free
trade?
We strongly urge President
Kumaratunga to let the people know the contents of this
agreement and what it holds for the future of this
country. The people have the right to know whether their
economic freedom and all what successive generations have
strived for are being sold down the drain.
Let the contents of the agreement
be made public for the people to decide.
|